EBRPPRC Support | Advocate | Empower

A Public Health Response to Drug Use Saves Lives

Drug use is often treated as a criminal justice problem, yet arrest rarely addresses the reasons people use drugs or the conditions that make harmful use more likely. Punishment can add homelessness, unemployment, family separation and a criminal record to an existing health crisis. A safer approach focuses on prevention, treatment, housing, peer support and practical risk reduction. Learn more about Californiapeaceofficer.org.

This debate matters in Australia as well as in East Baton Rouge Parish, Louisiana. Australian communities have seen the effects of methamphetamine, opioid dependence and alcohol-related harm, while laws and services differ between states and territories. The central question is consistent: should a person in distress meet a health worker who can help, or a police officer whose main available response is arrest?

Why Arrest Fails As Health Policy

Arrest may remove someone from a public place for a short time, but it does not remove dependence, trauma, withdrawal or unsafe housing. If a person is released without treatment, they often return to the same risks with added legal costs and greater distrust of authorities. A criminal record can make it harder to secure work, rent a home or qualify for some forms of support.

Criminalisation also discourages people from seeking emergency assistance. Someone who fears being charged may hesitate to call an ambulance after an overdose or avoid carrying naloxone. Friends may leave a person alone rather than involve police, turning a treatable medical emergency into a fatal one.

The public health case is practical, not permissive. It recognises that reducing deaths and disease requires contact with people who are using drugs. Needle and syringe programs, overdose education, medically supervised treatment and outreach services can create that contact without making arrest the default response.

What A Health-Led Response Looks Like

A public health model begins with assessment rather than accusation. A person may need opioid agonist treatment, withdrawal management, counselling, psychiatric care, wound treatment, housing assistance or help reconnecting with family. These needs should be considered together because drug use often overlaps with depression, violence, poverty, chronic illness and unstable accommodation.

Harm reduction is an important part of this system. Naloxone should be easy to obtain, and people should receive clear information about overdose signs, drug interactions and the heightened risk that can follow a period of abstinence. Drug checking, safer-use education and supervised consumption services can reduce preventable deaths while offering pathways into treatment.

Treatment must also be accessible when someone is ready. Long waiting lists, complicated referrals, transport problems and limited after-hours care can turn motivation into disappointment. Services should include peer workers, culturally safe practice and options for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities, whose experiences with policing and health institutions require particular care.

Lessons From Australian Practice

Australia already has examples of health-centred responses. Medically supervised injecting services in Sydney’s Kings Cross and Melbourne’s North Richmond have provided overdose response, clinical support and referrals without making arrest the centre of the interaction. These services do not eliminate drug use, but they can keep people alive long enough to accept further help.

Naloxone is available through community programs and pharmacies in many parts of Australia, and take-home supply has expanded through state and territory initiatives. Opioid dependence treatment, including methadone and buprenorphine, is delivered through authorised doctors, clinics and pharmacies, although cost, availability and regional access remain uneven. Medicare can support some medical care, but it does not guarantee an immediate appointment or free, local treatment.

The legal landscape is also mixed. Drug possession and supply offences remain criminal matters, while police diversion schemes can direct eligible people toward education or assessment instead of court. Queensland, New South Wales, Victoria and other jurisdictions apply different eligibility rules, and diversion is not equally available to every person. A health approach should therefore be built into policy consistently rather than left to individual discretion.

Everyday realities shape outcomes. A person sleeping rough in Melbourne may struggle to store medication safely; someone in regional Queensland may face a long drive to an opioid treatment provider; and a worker in Sydney may avoid a clinic whose opening hours conflict with a casual shift. The local market also changes quickly, with variable potency and unexpected substances increasing overdose risk.

Support That Keeps People Connected

A humane response depends on services that people can use before a crisis becomes an arrest. Communities benefit when health, housing and legal systems share responsibility without forcing a person to navigate several disconnected agencies.

Useful investments include:

Family members also need information and support. They may be managing financial stress, threats, childcare responsibilities or the fear of finding someone unresponsive. Clear advice about overdose response, boundaries and referral options can reduce isolation without asking relatives to become unpaid case managers.

In East Baton Rouge Parish, local advocacy can help shift attention from punishment to care, transparency and rehabilitation. The parish reform coalition provides a civic connection for people who want to understand jail conditions and support changes that protect incarcerated people, their families and the wider community.

Humane Custody And Public Oversight

A health-led policy must still address people who are already in custody. Jails hold many people with substance dependence, mental illness and untreated medical conditions. Withdrawal in detention can be dangerous, particularly when medication is interrupted or symptoms are mistaken for misconduct. Screening, continuity of opioid treatment, suicide prevention and prompt medical review are basic safety requirements.

Arrest should never become a substitute for treatment, but custody staff also need clear procedures when detention occurs. People should receive prescribed medication without unnecessary interruption, access to qualified clinicians and confidential communication about their health. Staff training should cover overdose, withdrawal, psychiatric crisis and de-escalation.

Family contact is part of health and safety. Regular visits, phone calls and reliable information can help a person maintain motivation, manage medication decisions and prepare for release. Restrictions that make contact unaffordable or unpredictable can deepen distress. The coalition’s discussion of why legal visits matter illustrates how communication and due process are connected to humane custody.

Independent oversight is essential because institutions cannot be expected to investigate themselves fully. Public reporting should cover deaths, emergency transfers, use of force, withdrawal management, medication access, complaints and release outcomes. Data should be disaggregated by race, age, gender, disability and location so policymakers can see who is being harmed and whether reforms are working.

A Safer Role For Police And Courts

Moving drug use toward health services does not mean abandoning public safety. Police still have responsibilities when there is violence, exploitation, dangerous driving or an immediate threat to another person. The change is that possession and personal use should not automatically produce incarceration when a health intervention is more likely to prevent harm.

Police can be trained to refer people to crisis teams, sobering-up services, outreach nurses and treatment providers. Courts can expand diversion, review whether people are receiving appropriate care and avoid conditions that are impossible for someone with unstable housing to meet. Prosecutors and judges should have access to evidence about treatment outcomes rather than relying on assumptions about deterrence.

A credible system needs measurable goals. Communities should track overdose deaths, emergency presentations, treatment retention, housing stability, repeat police contact and racial disparities. Success should mean fewer deaths and less preventable harm, rather than simply more arrests or longer sentences.

People who want to support this shift can begin with informed local participation:

The approach also needs sustained funding. Short pilot programs can demonstrate promise but leave people without support when grants end. Governments should fund treatment, peer services, housing and evaluation as core public infrastructure, with transparent budgets and community oversight.

For Australian readers, a useful first step is to locate the nearest alcohol and other drug service, learn where naloxone is available locally, and record the number of the state or territory drug and alcohol information line today.